Apr
7

Years ago I came up with a few drafts for an upstart tween magazine to see if eco-writing (ecology writing) was my thing, or at least I thing I can do. The magazine never materialized, and neither did my enviro pieces. Since it is a spring, I was hoping I could inject a little life to at least the following article where it probably could do good online, than dormant in an archived folder.
Being green doesn’t have to be difficult. In fact, it can be really fun, creative and inexpensive, on top of being extremely rewarding. It can be done, anywhere and anytime, with items commonly found in the home.
Natural or organic household products are biodegradable, sustainable and won’t harm the environment. Why? Because they are things that are already found in nature. For example, food scraps and wood shavings are items that can return to land safely. The soil gets a vitamin boost from the scraps and the shavings help control the moisture. The soil becomes regenerated and ready for new life–like trees and fruit-bearing plants. How do you know if something is safe to return to the earth? If the product came from the ground, chances are, it probably doesn’t mind going back into it. Read more
Mar
13
Who? Me? You Must be Miss-kitten.
Filed Under Told You So | Leave a Comment
Years ago (2004 to be exact) I thought Hello Kitty deserved a little re-branding. Her ageless youth was not to be tampered with, but rather her name.
Many of her longtime admirers had grown up and along with the famed cartoon. Didn’t she deserve a more age-appropriate moniker than Hello Kitty?
Hello Miss K is sublime and playful all at once. It’s more than a name, but a reference too; now that the old gal is familiar in pop culture.
Also, it’s current.
Starting and signing off e-mails, IMs, Twitters and more, with an initial is the norm. In the future, conversation and communication may be entirely reduced to single letters, which stand in for words and larger thoughts.
At this point, it’s not about Hello Kitty conforming. It’s about her keeping up. Remaining relevant is subject to a face-lift, now and then.
IMAGE | ANS | Hello Miss K | 2004 | Illustrator and a lot of patience
Feb
3
“Google Graphs.” Does it exist? No. Should it? Yes. Why? I hope you’re sitting for this one. (Really. Sit down; get settled. This post is a long one.)
Anyone who knows me, or has been in my company for somewhere between a dinner party and an e-mail-to-phone-calling-scheduling-for-coffee length of time will no doubt have to endure one of my diatribes about the organization of information.
Organizing information is not only the hear and now, but it is the future. (Please refer to “Data Analysis,” section 3.5, page 180, of the reprotext found below your seat.)
If the twentieth century was about the proliferation and access of information, than the twenty-first century, must be about the organization and analysis of that information. Simply, if the inventive quality of information is saturated in a modern era, than the analysis of the information is not; especially when there is so much to research and cross-research in a multitude of ways.
I first learned about DocuBurst from an article in The Toronto Star about two years ago. An interactive and graphic index, DocuBurst is the brainchild of Christopher Collins who, along with, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Gerald Penn, developed the project as part of his PhD research at the
DocuBurst’s function is two-fold. One, it provides the frequency in which a searched item appears (like a regular index). Two, it visually displays an overview of the magnitude of the searchable item within context of the document content. It does this by highlighting desired item searches, including words that occur before and after the searched item, and by a radiating pinwheel graphic, which bridges “is a” relationships to the searched item, rather than, “see also” relationships, (think related, not relative) to determine detailed and relevant information with each subsequent layer of burst. The interactive aspect of DocuBurst allows the search to occur at any point in the document (the index of the index of the index) while colour coding quickly shows words connected to the searched item.
If DocuBurst’s explanation sounds involved, you should see it’s pinwheel information graphics. Specific searches tend to lead into stunted sun rays, “bursts” away from the central search, thus commenting more on the DocuBurst itself, rather than searched item. (See, Spiro Novak’s essay “Rays Away: How Smart Devices Steer from Searches to Solstices,” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1999, in the Bibliography of the reprotext.)
In order for the graphic organization of information to be effective, it must provide a general overview, not a detailed one. Specifics potentially can take away from the overall picture. The purpose of the project, defeated, entirely. Read more
Nov
4
Shepherding the vote
Filed Under Told You So | 1 Comment
Look. If it wasn’t for this person, the American election wouldn’t be on the high-low course it’s been on for the past few months. Make no mistake. This person has been the pawn in the politics since the Republican-Democrat race got real interesting. Real interesting. I’m not going to argue here whether said person knew about being taken advantage of from the onset or not. All I know is, no matter what happens today, there’s going to be some blame, and guess who’s going to get it?
IMAGE | ANS | Goated | 2008 | Adobe Illustrator, a lot of anger, and the American way–interpreted by a Canadian who wishes she was a legal U.S. resident living in
Oct
31
Blessing in Disguise
Filed Under Told You So | Leave a Comment

The Night’s peace, disguised
as Madness; In spiritus,
Hallow, Hallow, ween.
Happy Halloween everyone!
IMAGE + POEM | ANS | Peace Squashed + Blessing in Disguise | 2008 | Adobe Illustrator and magazine cutouts from Report on Business. (How’s that for irony? I do read the mag by the way, and enjoy it a lot.)
Jun
30
Brand Wagon: Part Four, Final Part.
Filed Under Told You So | Leave a Comment
PART 4 FINAL PART I accept that, depending on who you talk to, to be an artist in this day and age is basically understood as someone who lives and works below the poverty line–spending time making amusing cartoons for family and friends’ enjoyment. These are the people designers should keep watch. These people, are the ones who will question an artists worth, mainly because it so often is completely opposite to their living and working world, and most likely makes them uncomfortable (in its unfamiliarity) of how artists, and designers, function. These are the same people who may have initially pressured designers to succumb to a new kind of title or categorization (rebranding) in the first place. When it comes to selling these people on ideas, service and opinion, no doubt, they will require the most amount of education and instruction. These people will have to be reminded how artists are a contributing member of society and that together, through collaboration, will generate works beyond any individual effort. These people can be assured that working visually and intelligently is the only way to access an audience, globally, and that meticulous strategy (or design for those staunch pragmatists) will be the difference between confusion or communication. These people will appreciate how the multiplication of the work generated, will not diminish its artistic integrity, but instead, establish it as an affordable, accessible commodity (because of its artistry!) These people must accept their role, not as critic, or client, but as patron–a Patron of the arts.
Jun
25
Brand Wagon: Part Three.
Filed Under Told You So | 1 Comment
PART 3 Essentially, when “design” transitioned from “art” to “graphic,” sadly, it did not evolve; it conformed. Conformity is what has caused designers to bow to others impressions of their own discipline, skill, trade, craft, knowledge and, yes, I’m going to say it, artistry. Conformity is what is still killing designers now to rebrand themselves into a title or industry that I don’t think will truly ever reflect what designers do, and actually, degrade designers and the community further than the reduction they assumed when they initially decided to hold a distinction against Art, but used it as its foundation in an attempt to raise its platform. (Huh? How did you think that was going to work?) Rebranding design’s identity won’t work. Taking up the role of the artist, will. Read more
Jun
20
Brand Wagon: Part Two.
Filed Under Told You So | Leave a Comment
PART 2 Educating a client has always been the job of the graphic designer (so, for all you designers out there, you could probably add “communication teacher” to the list of titles already proposed.) Education justifies the cost of service while it sells the client on professional opinion. My understanding of the rebranding of designers is that a name change can better describe the evolution (more on this later) of the designer and may, hopefully, be commonly understood among designers and clients alike. As much as I would love for a new change in title to get around numerous explanations of why all the white space on the page shouldn’t be filled, and really, why the type should be set smaller is really just a joke. A designer can never do away with informing his client on how the design process works regardless of the name change. Nor will it guarantee a client’s willingness to accept what a designer’s job entails, and to hold that job into great esteem. Yes, in part, this is because the tech age has brought much accessibility, pirated software, and lots of so-called experts in the field. (Designers, I’m begging you, quit your whining! Every field in arts and culture has been impacted with all the new directors, illustrators, industrial designers, writers, authors, playwrights, poets, musicians and so on who can get their hands on Adobe Creative Suite, Pro Tools, and a whole other host of “icreate” software.) But the real reason, is actually much older than that; a problem that in all its stages and players has never experienced a resolution, even to this day. It’s what Saldanha briefly touches upon in his quandary in Evolution. It is the way in which the arts and artists are perceived by the general public, as a whole.
Jun
17
Enough Already. Get off the Brand Wagon!
Filed Under Told You So | 2 Comments
Designers worried about industry nomenclature? How about Babbitt?





